September 14, 2009

Fixing the Waiver

First, let me offer congratulations to all this weeks winners. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like there are any games left to be decided by Monday Night Football. Second, my condolences to those who dropped their week one games but I do offer you a warm welcome to fantasy hell..... its not really that bad once you get used to it.

Now to business. I am very sorry for the waver wire confusion that has taken place in week one. Last year, all unowned players were available to be picked up at any time. I made the mistake, because I didn't understand the settings, of putting all unowned players on a First game - Tuesday waiver wire. I don't want to get into all the specifics about how this works....partly because I still don't know that I understand it, but I want everyone to know that I am changing it back. Tomorrow morning at 6 a.m. central time, I will be changing back to last year's format. Just like the rest of the settings, it should have required a vote to change the waiver wire settings. If anyone is interested in putting this issue to a vote, please voice your opinion in the comments. However, until a unanimous decision is made to change the setting on waivers, I will be changing it back as of tomorrow morning at 6 a.m. The early bird gets the worm.

2 comments:

  1. Wait. You accidentally changed the settings so that they were different, and basically unintelligible. Now you're going to change it back to the way we thought it would be, and we don't even get to vote? He's drunk off power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the Commish's resolution to this makes sense. Also, in reference to Digital's email, unless some proposal limiting the number of waiver moves is put to a vote and approved, I don't think anyone should feel an obligation to limit the number of moves they make. If such a proposal were made, I, for one, would vote it down. I believe Digital's molestation of the waiver wire is one of the things that makes our league beautiful. However, I can see the other side of this issue, so I don't mean to discourage anyone from making such a proposal.

    ReplyDelete