July 14, 2010

Draft

We need to maximize physical attendance at the draft. I like hearing Taylor and Scott's enthusiasm. I will also be ready for the draft whenever the need arises. I am more than happy to host the draft, and believe that it's worth at least a full weekend of celebration, so people can stay at my place as long as they desire. If you guys prefer a different locale, I'm certainly not trying to "hog" the draft site, and will be happy to travel.

A few things to keep in mind:
Check your schedule for upcoming weddings. Last year Everett outdrafted all of us then attended two weddings. None of the rest of us should expect to be able to pull off such a feat.

Some have suggested that if a Saturday draft doesn't work, a Friday evening draft may be an option.

If I'm not mistaken, John already asked off work for the Saturday of Labor Day weekend, and he typically works on Saturdays. So if we aren't going to draft on that Saturday, we need to figure out when we will pronto out of respect for Oldman's commitment.

Feel free to post your most preferred draft whens and wheres in the comments.

Trade One of the Season

Scott and I have agreed in principle to swap Ray Rice and Michael Turner. Vote in the comments to approve the trade.

Scheduling

Sorry to bombard all of you with more issues to discuss, however I feel that this is another important matter that has been overlooked in the past. Every year the schedule for our league is created based on the order people join. The past few years I have created the league and Brandon is the first to join, thus setting a week one match up between myself and Brandon (I have never won any of these games by the way). I suggest that this year after the draft is complete but before we play sod field football, we put each team in a hat to draw for week our week one matchups. I am pretty sure the schedule can be changed by the commissioner up to the beginning of the first week. I guess after the week one matchups, Yahoo will determine the rest of our schedule. Thoughts? Also, if you have not read previous posts, please do so.

Keeper Issue Raised

Scott has raised an interesting point and offered to initiate a change to our keeper format, thus giving many of us little guys with weak keepers a glimmer of hope. For those of you not caught up in the hype just yet, here is what you have missed. Scott has graciously offered to change our keeper format to make it so that your keeper costs you the pick in the round he is projected rather than the next round. I of course, am very much for this change. Taylor has expressed his support as well. Now we need some feedback from others. Let us know what you think of this proposed change. I am assuming that by keeping two players in the same projected round, you would give up your next round pick as well. In some cases, like Scott with Rice and Peterson, this is great value. He is getting Rice at essentially the 20th pick. However, it also makes managers really look at where they pick in each round and determine the value of possible keepers.

The other issue that I didn't raise last night but should be discussed. Last year we based our keepers projected value on the Yahoo player listing. That player listing is not available until I create the league and if I'm not mistaking, once the league was created last year those player rankings/values never changed. Would we be better served to find a player ranking system that is updated regularly and that all can view prior to the creation of our Yahoo league. More to chew on.

Foooooooooooooooooooooooooooooox!

I guarantee you gentlemen that no other fantasy player across the nation felt the sting of the Carolina Panthers troubles last year more than yours truly. After tricking Tyler into trading me DeAngelo Williams for my recognition that he has balls, no one wanted DeAngelo to top the RB's more than me. Despite an ankle injury that kept him out of a few games and limited his carries in several others, when DeAngelo was healthy and given the ball he produced as well as anyone last year not named Chris Johnson. I did the smart thing and snagged Jonathan Stewart, or as I call him JStew, as the handcuff. But I quickly discovered JStew is more than a handcuff. On four or five Sundays it was completely legit to play both Williams and Stewart and they would split 40 fantasy points between them. However, both finished outside of the top ten in fantasy points, and were unable to give me my second. I ask why?

Most importantly, Jake Delhomme was absolutely awful every second he was under center. He threw an insane amount of interceptions and it really limited the carries for both backs because the offense just couldn't stay on the field.

Secondly, John Fox seemed much less committed to the run than he was in 2008. It almost seemed like because Delhomme was throwing so many picks, he wanted to allow Delhomme to throw more to gain some confidence. In other words, he treated Delhomme like a future franchise rookie QB. That made no sense.

Third, the Panthers were often playing from behind and were unable to stay with the run in the fourth quarter when the defenses are worn out.

It is quite a shame the Panthers have been unable to surround Williams and JStew with more offensive talent, because both of these guys are absolute studs. In terms of talent alone, I think both are legitimate top five backs in this league. Will they have more productive years in 2010?

Here's the good news: yes. The Panthers have let Delhomme go to Cleveland and are placing the offense in the hands of Matt Moore, who wasn't Kolbesque in his starts last year, but proved to be a formidable leader. Clausen is clearly the QB of the future, but Moore is the leader for at least this year. With Moore at the helm, I expect Fox to rely heavily on Williams and JStew for the first eight to ten weeks. I suspect there are several games in which both players get 20+ carries. Both guys are too talented to use otherwise. Let's remember despite the Panthers struggles, both had solid ypc numbers. For fantasy purposes, if you own Deangelo, Stewart is a must have. If both are healthy, both can start for your team against weaker run d's and poorer teams.

Predictions:

Williams - 1300 yds, 12 TDs
Stewart - 1,050 yds, 8 TDs

July 13, 2010

Mathematics of Talent this year

As we in the "Triumvirate" (when collectively referring to Jason, Taylor, and Scott from now on, this address would be preferred) were discussing, the running back talent is sketchy relative to wide receivers this year.  We believe there are clear tiers for the running backs and there is a much more vague delineation between wide receivers.  In addition, due to the presence of RB committees, the production falls off rather sharply.  Finally, as we all know, you are less likely to be able to predict the performance of players which are chosen later in the draft, or not at all.  Barring very severe outliers such as Chris Johnson/Steve Slaton in '08 and Miles Austin in '09, I try to illustrate these points mathematically in the figure below.  You can see the RB ideal curve for this years draft has a discontinuous character more in line with a series of step functions convolved with a line.  For the WR ideal curve however, the function is more continuous and is represented by a classical sigmoid (modified logistic function) convolved with a line.  To make the prediction more realistic, I have included noise on top of these data.  The noise itself is also a monotonically increasing function of "Draft Order for Respective Position", although the RB data are noisier as is often the case.   Cheerio.  And please read the previous post by our esteemed commissioner.

The Progression of a Gentlemen's Game

Most upstanding pirate gentlemen, I am writing to welcome all of you back for the official beginning of the Gentlemen's Game pre-season. It's time to begin open door discussions of league rules, trades, and other important fantasy reforms. I know there has been much fantasy chatter behind closed doors, particularly among the now infamous "Big Three". Jason, Taylor, and Scott have been busy hatching plots to make the rich even richer while myself and Oldman have been unionizing the rest of the league in order to promote progressive reforms that would have a leveling affect on the league and keep things interesting. The main objective of this post is to ask that we begin to take our discussions league wide (bring it to the blog). I have caused a stir with some by proclaiming that I will no longer be operating this league as a democracy. Though I would prefer to bring an iron fisted approach to the leadership of our league and promote only those changes that would benefit myself, I could not, in good conscience, operate this prestigious league in such a way. As in years past, we must bring any and all ideas and concerns to an open forum for debate and vote. In addition, I really think we need to start the hype machine for this season. To do this, lets get the blog hopping with posts. Last year I felt like Taylor's weekly wrap up of the weekend's games was an excellent addition to the hype. Scott has done solid work as well, giving his perspective on players and teams to watch. Jason, we need access to more of your wit and brilliance. Ben, we need you to begin stirring the pot as only you can...end some friendships and create draft day tension my friend. John, all of your old nonsensical comments are welcomed. Brandon, more hyperlinks please. I think you all get the point.
Now for some issues that need to be discussed openly before the season:
1) I suggest a change in the waiver/free agent system this year. I speak not only for myself, but I believe many others in saying that it is becoming increasingly difficult to spend Sunday afternoons watching football and checking stats in order to jump on the next best free agent. I would prefer to have a 3 day waiver period where managers can put in bids for free agents. The order of waiver preference would rotate on a weekly basis.
2) We need to discuss people's availability for the draft. Last year we did it on Labor Day weekend. I know Brandon is out for that weekend, but I need to hear from the rest of you.
3) Scoring and Playoffs. Do we have any suggestions for changes to the scoring format or playoffs.
4) Off Season Trades. Remember, these must be brought to the league managers for a vote. There must be a at least 6 votes for the trade for it to go through.
5) Any other miscellaneous items that I have missed, please bring those up as well.

I look forward to starting the hype machine. Let the pre-season begin.