Scott has raised an interesting point and offered to initiate a change to our keeper format, thus giving many of us little guys with weak keepers a glimmer of hope. For those of you not caught up in the hype just yet, here is what you have missed. Scott has graciously offered to change our keeper format to make it so that your keeper costs you the pick in the round he is projected rather than the next round. I of course, am very much for this change. Taylor has expressed his support as well. Now we need some feedback from others. Let us know what you think of this proposed change. I am assuming that by keeping two players in the same projected round, you would give up your next round pick as well. In some cases, like Scott with Rice and Peterson, this is great value. He is getting Rice at essentially the 20th pick. However, it also makes managers really look at where they pick in each round and determine the value of possible keepers.
The other issue that I didn't raise last night but should be discussed. Last year we based our keepers projected value on the Yahoo player listing. That player listing is not available until I create the league and if I'm not mistaking, once the league was created last year those player rankings/values never changed. Would we be better served to find a player ranking system that is updated regularly and that all can view prior to the creation of our Yahoo league. More to chew on.
2018-19 Conference Honors & Awards
7 years ago

